Legal Opinion

Jacob v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1904No. Docket No. 63PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Case by Abram Jacob against the Western Union Telegraph Company for delay in transmitting a message. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

On the 10th oí September, 1900, plaintiff wrote a broker in New York to buy him a car of lemons. On the 12th of the same month plaintiff desired to reduce this order, and so sent by defendant a telegram to buy only 60 boxes. This telegram was delivered in Detroit at a quarter before 8 or a quarter before 9 in the morning. The telegram was sent to the office of defendant by a messenger boy, who gave notice that plaintiff wished the message to be in New York by 11 a. m. The message was sent without delay to Buffalo, but was there *602delayed by a storm which interrupted communication with New York,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rudell v. Ogdensburg Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Birkett v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Fleischner v. Pacific Postal Telegraph Cable Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commercial Milling Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API