Glasco v. State

The Ross decision itself was a retroactive application of its holding to the enhancement of Ross's offense from a Class A misdemeanor to a Class C felony and to the further enhancement pursuant to the general habitual offender statute. That holding invalidated the multiple enhancements relying upon the reasoning and analysis utilized in Freeman v. State, 658 *976N.E.2d 68 (Ind.1995). Quite clearly, our Supreme Court in Ross unanimously felt that the result was the product of the Freeman decision. My reading of Ross, therefore, leads me to the unmistakable conclusion that the decision was…