Legal Opinion

Harold Dean Wilson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided August 30, 2011No. 07-11-00019-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NO. 07-11-00019-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

AUGUST 30, 2011

HAROLD DEAN WILSON, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 22,015-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

ORDER

Before us are appellant’s motion to unseal one volume of the reporter’s record, sealed by the trial court according to Rule of Evidence 412,[1] and appellant’s motion for additional time to file his brief. We will deny appellant’s motion to unseal the record and grant him fourteen days…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reyna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Wofford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  3. Kesterson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  4. Southwell, Jr. Witson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API