Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 2001No. WD 58171PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

Larry L. Young appeals from his convictions of acceding to corruption, § 576.020, 1 and failure to execute an arrest warrant, § 575.180. Young raises two points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court erred in refusing to direct the verdict on the acceding to corruption count because the State failed as a matter of law to prove the elements of acceding to corruption in that there was no evidence that he received the benefit described in the information, sexual intercourse, as established by the jury’s rejection of the sexual assault count and the State’s failure to present…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MoonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. PetersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. GilpinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. LudwigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. State v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RoseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State v. Franco-AmadorMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. MasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. CopelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API