Legal Opinion

Blunt v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1949No. Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 44,210PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

In this case plaintiffs seek to set aside the sale of certain land at scavenger sale, and to compel a conveyance to them. The taxes for 1935 and prior years became delinquent on certain land in Oakland county which will be herein designated as the “north 40.” The tax on this parcel was sold and bid in by the State at the 1942 tax sale and thereafter the title of the State became absolute. In due course of time said north 40 was conveyed by the auditor general to the State land office board, put into the “scavenger sale” by that board in 1944, at which time the plaintiff, Waldo E. Blunt, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James A. Welch Co. v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. McCredie v. BuxtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Caplan v. JeromeMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Mount Clemens Savings Bank v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Schnackenberg v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Langford v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Chilton's, Inc. v. Wilmington Apartment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Fisher v. MullerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Bean v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Golden v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API