Legal Opinion

Bradford v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 14, 1921No. 2609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This case, on writ of error from the original motion for new-trial, is reported in 151 Ga. 334 (106 S. E. 718).

1Opinion of the CourtEish, C. J.

Under the practice in this State, every motion for a new trial, whether ordinary or extraordinary, must be made during term. An ordinary motion must be made during the term at which the trial was had; and an extraordinary one may be made during a subsequent term. In this case an extraordinary motion for a new trial was made and filed in vacation; the judge heard it on its merits in vacation, and overruled it in vacation. The entire proceeding was nugatory. The judge erred in entertaining jurisdiction of the motion and deciding it upon its merits. According to previous rulings of this court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  2. Bradford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API