Legal Opinion
Goodwin v. Boesky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 6, 1995No. Nos. 89 Civ. 0510 (MP), 89 Civ. 3782 (MP), 89 Civ. 3783 (MP), 89 Civ. 3786 (MP), 89 Civ. 5567 (MP), and 89 Civ. 7722 (MP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge:
On the eve of trial of the so-called Pacific Lumber Class and Shareholder Trading actions, six in number, brought by former shareholders of Pacific and consolidated in the above-captioned multi-district litigation, a Settlement was reached on May 17, 1994, providing for a settlement fund of up to $52 million less reserves for taxes and adminis*553tration. Those six actions were consolidated in the above-captioned multi-district litigation (MDL 732) and certified by the Court to proceed on behalf of a plaintiff class (Class VI). The Court additionally…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation. (Appeal of Attorneys' Fee Awards)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Grunin v. International House of PancakesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Markakis v. Liberian S/S Mparmpa ChrisTos Her EnginesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- In Re Boesky Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995