Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Michael S. Bradford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 26, 2014No. 1130503PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MAIN, Justice.

Pennsylvania- National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (“Penn National”) was sued by Jacob T. Walker, an employee of its named insured; seeking underinsured-motorist (“UIM”) benefits following an automobile accident. After settling the claims against it, Penn National filed a cross-claim against Michael S. Bradford, the alleged tortfeasor, asserting a subrogation theory of recovery. The trial court dismissed the cross-claim on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations, and Penn National appealed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I. Facts and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Rice v. United Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Raley v. Citibanc of Alabama/AndalusiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Sahloff v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zajic v. Payne (Ex parte Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API