Legal Opinion

Gaccino v. Gaccino

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1955Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrenner, J.

The plaintiff wife in this proceeding seeks summarily to have her husband’s cash bail declared forfeited and to apply same against arrears of alimony and counsel fees. Notice of the motion was given to the city, which is the custodian of the funds, to the assignee of such funds and to the defendant husband. The defendant and the assignee have defaulted. The city requests that its appearance be noted but wishes that it be recorded as neither opposing nor consenting to the motion. Despite the fact that no papers are before me in opposition to the motion, I am concerned about the oral intimation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chancer v. ChancerNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Subernick v. SubernickNew York Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API