Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Hall)

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1984No. B006613PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

By a petition, for writ of mandate and prohibition, the People seek to vacate an order denying their motion to disqualify a superior court judge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6. We issued an alternative writ of mandate to resolve the issue of whether the motion was timely filed.

Section 170.6 sets forth a procedure by which a party or attorney for a party may move to disqualify a judge. The motion must be supported by an affidavit to the effect that the judge is prejudiced against the party or his attorney so that the party cannot, or believes he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Eagle Maintenance & Supply Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. People v. Abdul Y.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. EscobedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Hospital Council of Northern California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. La Seigneurie U.S. Holdings, Inc. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Reygoza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Shipp v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Lawrence v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. WhitfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API