Legal Opinion

Alweiss v. City of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 26, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02095Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 DANIEL ALWEISS, No. 2:21-cv-02095-WBS-DB 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS 15 CITY OF SACRAMENTO; MARIO LARA; SHANNON BROWN; CHRIS CONLIN; 16 UNNAMED CITY OF SACRAMENTO POLICE OFFICERS 1-3; LARRY K. 17 JOYNER; ST. PAUL CHURCH OF GOD- CHRIST; FIRST STEP COMMUNITIES- 18 THE GROVE; PG&E; and DOES 1-25, 19 Defendants. 20 21 ----oo0oo---- 22 Plaintiff Daniel Alweiss brought this action against 23 the City of Sacramento (the “City”), various Sacramento Parks 24 Department and City…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API