Legal Opinion

Beaudoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 12, 1992No. 90-863PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

594 So.2d 1049 (1992)

Sharon Z. BEAUDOIN, et ux., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-863.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

February 12, 1992.

Writ Denied May 8, 1992.

Broussard, Bolton, Halcomb & Vizzier, Daniel Broussard, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gist, Methvin, Hughes & Munsterman, David Hughes, Alexandria, for defendant-appellee.

Before DOMENGEAUX, C.J., STOKER, J., and MARCANTEL,[*] J. Pro Tem.

BERNARD N. MARCANTEL, Judge. Pro Tem.

The issue on appeal is whether plaintiff is entitled to damages in tort or, in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Domengeaux; Concurrence · Stoker.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  3. Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. White v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. Lirette v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. LaBove v. RafterySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. Smith v. Ouachita Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Griffith v. LouisianaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
  5. Jeansonne v. Wick Pub. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API