Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Dickson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1946No. 1 Div. 242PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The case made by the amended bill is to prevent the obstruction of a roadway and the equity is rested upon the right of a public road by prescription.

The general rule in this jurisdiction is that “an open, defined roadway, in continuous use by the public as a highway, without let or hindrance, for a period of 20 years, becomes a public highway by prescription.” Central of Georgia Railway v. Faulkner, 217 Ala. 82, 114 So. 686, 687.

The bill of complaint to successfully assert such a right must show adverse user, excluding the private rights of the owner, continuously and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Trump v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Stewart v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Attorney General v. Lakeview Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blevins v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Smith-Howard Gin Co. v. OgletreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API