Dickson v. Dickson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
The case made by the amended bill is to prevent the obstruction of a roadway and the equity is rested upon the right of a public road by prescription.
The general rule in this jurisdiction is that “an open, defined roadway, in continuous use by the public as a highway, without let or hindrance, for a period of 20 years, becomes a public highway by prescription.” Central of Georgia Railway v. Faulkner, 217 Ala. 82, 114 So. 686, 687.
The bill of complaint to successfully assert such a right must show adverse user, excluding the private rights of the owner, continuously and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Trump v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Stewart v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Attorney General v. Lakeview Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blevins v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Smith-Howard Gin Co. v. OgletreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948