Legal Opinion

W.R.M. v. H.C.V.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 9, 2007No. 2006-CA-0702PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

JjOn July 7, 2003, W.R.M. filed a “Petition to Establish Filiation” against H.C.V. and M.J.V., alleging that he is the biological father of A.M.V as a result of an adulterous affair between H.C.V. and W.R.M. In response, H.C.V. and M.J.V. filed exceptions of no cause of action, no right of action, and prescription. While these exceptions were pending, the Louisiana Legislature passed Act 530 of 2004, which enacted La. Civ.Code art. 191. H.C.V. and M.J.V. filed supplemental exceptions based on the application of La. Civ.Code art. 191, arguing that W.R.M. failed to comply with the two-year…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marcus Miller v. Harold Thibeaux,lafayette Parish School Board and American Alternative Insurance CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  2. Ebinger v. VENUS CONST. CORP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Burkette v. General Motors, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. In re PeltLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. K.A.E.M. v. J.M.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API