Legal Opinion
Chase v. Roy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 2, 1973PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuirico, J.
These three actions of tort for negligence are before us on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of his motions (a) for directed verdicts, (b) for the entry of verdicts under leave reserved, and (c) for a new trial. Additional exceptions to the denial of motions for a mistrial are expressly waived by the defendant in his brief.
By agreement of all parties the cases were first tried on the issue of liability and were submitted to the jury on special questions relating to the liability of each defendant to the plaintiffs. The jury thereupon returned with affirmative answers to the questions…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Kelly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Feneff v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Stewart v. Roy Bros. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Brenda Payton v. Abbott Labs, Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Alholm v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Deerskin Trading Post, Inc. v. Spencer Press, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- D'Annolfo v. Stoneham Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Elias v. Unisys Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.