Legal Opinion
Vereen v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 10, 1994No. 94-691PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Affirmed without prejudice to resubmit the Rule 3.850 motion with the proper oath. See Van Tassell v. State, 601 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).1
AFFIRMED.
PETERSON, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.. We note that the order denying the 3.850 motion is also insufficient. A copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that Vereen is entitled to no relief is not attached to the order as required by Rule 3.850(d).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Van Tassell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Saba v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996