Seymour v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
This appeal arises from a denial of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, appellant raises three questions for review:
1. Did the State of Michigan fail to comply with the Agreement on Detain-ers, A.R.S. § 31-481, Art. III?
2. Did the State of Michigan deny appellant a speedy trial ?
3. Should appellant have had counsel at a Governor’s extradition hearing?
The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows. On November 27, 1971, one Bill Bradley and appellant were arrested in the State of Indiana. Both Bradley and appellant were on parole from Arizona.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Applications of OppenheimerArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Rugg v. BurrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Atkins v. State ex rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
3Cited by16 opinions
- Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States v. Robert DobsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- People v. DailyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- United States v. Wardell Byron Harris, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- State v. BurrusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.