Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Goodwin

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. The facts material to the points decided appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, C. J.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

Conceding the right of Perry, as a judgment creditor of Adams & Co., to intervene in this suit, the judgment is improper.

The third instruction, “ that if the defendants’ evidence has raised a well grounded suspicion in the minds of the jury, that the plaintiff did not come fairly by the note in question, and is not the bona fide holder and owner thereof, this would throw the proof of the bona fides upon the plaintiff; and if the jury believed that this well grounded suspicion of want of ownership existed, and also believed, that the plaintiff had not shown by…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Himmelmann v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Kunz v. California Trona Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API