Legal Opinion

Sprayberry v. Sheffield Auto & Truck Service, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 6, 1982No. AK-64PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

422 So.2d 1073 (1982)

Dianne D. and David L. SPRAYBERRY, Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

v.

SHEFFIELD AUTO AND TRUCK SERVICE, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. AK-64.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 6, 1982.

Ernest W. Welch of Welch & Munroe, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellants/cross-appellees.

Frank E. Sheffield, Tallahassee, for appellee/cross-appellant.

JOANOS, Judge.

Appellants Dianne D. and David L. Sprayberry, plaintiffs below, argue the following points on appeal: (1) that the trial court improperly granted a directed verdict on the basis that the quantum of proof…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashland Oil, Inc. v. PickardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Bankers Trust Company, a Corporation v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation, and the Century Insurance Company, Limited, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. Harrell v. BransonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Rigot v. BucciSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Canal Authority v. Ocala Mfg., Ice & Packing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. AFM Corp. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Royal Typewriter Company, a Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc., a Corporation v. Xerographic Supplies Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Nordyne v. Florida Mobile Home SupplyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Wieczoreck v. H & H BUILDERS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Burton v. Linotype Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API