Legal Opinion

Cardellicchio v. Board of Retirement of Natick

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 3, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

The sole issue in this case is whether service performed by the plaintiff, Jerry V. Cardellicchio, for which he was compensated the sum of eighty cents by the town of Natick on April 24, 1939, constitutes “employment” within the meaning of G. L. c. 32, § 60, as amended through St. 1973, c. 207, § 7. If we determine that such service constitutes employment on or prior to June 30, 1939, Cardellicchio, who is a military veteran and has thirty years of employment with the Natick fire department, will be entitled to receive substan tial noncontributory retirement benefits pursuant to G. L. c. 32,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Town of Lexington v. Town of BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Bianchi v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. LaCouture v. RETIREMENT BOARD OF QUINCYMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Sullivan v. BOSTON RETIREMENT BOARDMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Glorioso v. Retirement Board of WellesleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Retirement Board v. ColleranMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  4. DiGregorio v. CommonwealthMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1990
  5. DiGianni v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API