Legal Opinion

Matter of Bd. of Educ. of the Connetquot Cent. Sch. Dist. of Islip

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the order and judgment of Supreme Court reinstated.

The arbitration sought in this instance lies within the permissible scope of the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law, art 14), and the issue tendered (the right of the teachers association to use office space in school buildings) falls within the ambit of the broad arbitration clause contained in the collective bargaining agreement between the parties (cf. Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.], 42 NY2d 509, 513-514).

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Port Washington Union Free School District v. Port Washington Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between Board of Education of Watertown City School District & Watertown Education Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. BOCES II Teachers' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Incorporated Village of Lake Grove v. Civil Service Employees Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Board of Education of Yonkers City School District v. Yonkers Federation of TeachersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Copiague Union Free School District v. Copiague Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API