Legal Opinion

James Howard Turner v. State of Tennessee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1988No. 87-5891PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The State of Tennessee appeals the district court’s conditional grant of a writ of habeas corpus. James Howard Turner, who was awaiting retrial in a Tennessee criminal court, petitioned the district court for habeas corpus relief on the grounds that his impending retrial would violate his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel and his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law free of vindictive prosecution. The district court conditionally granted the writ, and we now affirm.

I

Turner and two co-defendants, Earl Carroll and Sam…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LemkeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. State v. TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. United States v. William Day, A/K/A William McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Harris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ricardo Arredondo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API