Legal Opinion
State v. Heaps
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 21, 1984No. 12251-7-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, C.J.
Arthur L. Heaps appeals his adjudication as a habitual criminal, alleging the constitutional invalidity of the underlying felony convictions used in the habitual offender proceeding. We affirm.
Heaps was convicted of first degree robbery and attempted robbery in King County on January 21, 1982. He was then charged by supplemental information with being a habitual criminal. The habitual criminal charge was based upon four out-of-state felony convictions — two Utah convictions for theft and burglary and two California forgery convictions. The California convictions were entered upon a guilty…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, MARICOPA CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984