Hodges v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentTownsend, J.
A remark by the trial court which supplies as evidence a fact not in the record is, if prejudicial, cause for a new trial. Phillips v. State, 18 Ga. App. 109 (2) (88 S. E. 905). In this case it is the opinion of the writer that the remark by the trial court, that “it is not customary to prosecute the man on that offense if the court uses it for revocation of the suspended sentence,” constitutes such a remark. It was material, in that it entirely nullified the attack on the credibility of the witness, which was attempted by showing on cross-examination that he had not been prosecuted for the…
2Cases cited103 opinions
- Cawthon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Gore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.