Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. The Irvine Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1997No. 95-56785Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

117 F.3d 1425

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee,

v.

THE IRVINE COMPANY, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellant.

No. 95-56785.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 5, 1997, Pasadena, California.

July 2, 1997.

1

Before: THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD,**…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kandis L. Papike v. Tambrands Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. McGee v. WeinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Stafford v. Oil Tool Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Ginther v. TiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API