Legal Opinion

George F. Stuhmer & Co. v. Korman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate and set aside the preliminary injunction contained in the order to show cause granted, without costs. We are of opinion that the notice contemplated by section 882 of the Civil Practice Act, as amended by Laws of 1930, chapter 378, in effect September first,* is a formal notice of the application in the action pending, or if the action be not pending, bearing the title of the action to be brought, either with or without the papers Upon which the application is based, returnable forthwith or at such…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Sandnes v. Sheriff of Kings CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Reid v. Budget Credit, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kramm v. HollowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API