Legal Opinion

(SS) Gillaspy v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 12, 2022No. 1:19-cv-01666Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAWN GREGORY GILLASPY, Case No. 1: 19-cv-01666-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATION FOR AWARD OF EAJA FEES AND GRANTING 13 v. PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 15, 16, 17, 18) 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. 18 INTRODUCTION 19 Petitioner Matthew F. Holmberg (“Counsel” or “Petitioner”), attorney for Shawn Gregory 20 Gillaspy (“Plaintiff”), filed the instant amended motion for attorney fees on November 16, 2021. 21 (Mot. Att’y Fees…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Walker v. BennettDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API