Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Trimarco v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1981Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Fein, J. (concurring in part; dissenting in part).

I concur with Justice Sandler that the evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict that the landlord breached its duty of reasonable care toward the plaintiff and that such breach was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries. I see no need to expand on his thoughtful opinion demonstrating that liability was established.

However, I disagree with his conclusion that it was proper to submit sections 389-m and 389-o of the General Business Law for the jury’s consideration. The ostensible reason for receiving the statute in evidence was to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loeser v. Nathan Hale Gardens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Bennett v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Weiss v. WallachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Carhart v. Relmar Operating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Jokelson v. Allied Stores Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API