Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff, Mary Reynolds, was injured while crossing a trench which had been dug in Stoughton Street, Boston, in the work of relaying tracks of the defendant. A rail which was being handled by workmen of the defendant rolled upon her foot. The defendant had a permit to open the street in the form usual for such permits under *182the ordinances of the city of Boston, c. 28, § 9, and c. 3, § 21, then in force.

No notice of the time, place and cause of the injury, such as is called for by the statutes now embodied in G. L. c. 161, § 89, was given before the suit was brought.

At the trial the judge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vincent v. Norton & Taunton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. McMahon v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Dobbins v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Brookhouse v. Union Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. Connors v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berlandi v. Union Freight RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Moore v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API