Legal Opinion

Clayes & Morse v. Ferris & Higbee

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1838PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Trespass, for taking two horses. Plea — -General issue. Verdict for plaintiffs, and exceptions by defendants to the decision of the county court, in rejecting testimony.

1Opinion of the Court

The facts in the case sufficiently appear from the opinion of the court, which was delivered by

Royce, J.

The plaintiffs appear to have rested their case, ■ in the outset, upon mere proof of possession of the property sued for, and a taking by the defendants. The defendants proved that they took the horses upon writs of execution against Elwood Irish, the former owner; and with a view to impeach the plaintiffs’ title, as against the creditors of Irish, introduced evidence tending to affect the plaintiffs’ purchase from Irish with a defective and fraudulent trust, though for the professed…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State v. MagoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877
  4. Thayer v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865
  5. Goss v. TurnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API