Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Blumengarten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, directing appellant, the coexeeutrix, to account. Order affirmed, without costs. The will named respondent and appellant as coexeeutors. Appellant, the testator’s daughter, was the sole beneficiary under the will and the testator had no creditors. Part of the testator’s “ estate ” consisted of property held in trust by the testator for appellant and others. Those trust assets were part of the “estate” only for accounting and tax purposes. Appellant and respondent both qualified as executors. Appellant paid the funeral bill out of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BusheNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Gensinger v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of MullonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Anderson v. CarlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Estate of StephensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API