Legal Opinion

Brogan v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 2010No. 57A04-0910-CR-592PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Senior Judge.

This appeal requires a follow-up and application of the recent Indiana Supreme Court decision in Wallace v. State, 905 N.E.2d 371 (Ind.2009), reh'g denied. The principle enunciated in that case is that application of the 1994 Sex Offender Registration Law to persons who committed a sex offense prior to enactment of that law constitutes a violation of the ex post facto *1287clause of the Indiana Constitution. Ind. Const. Art. I, § 24.1

The decision, however, did not set forth any procedures or guidelines for implementation of the newly announced principle to other…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lowery v. State Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Rene Ex Rel. Rene v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brogan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Garau Germano, P.C., and Faith Fenner v. Stephen W. RobertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Ronald Andrew Manley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API