Legal Opinion

State v. Gullie

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1989No. 8910SC383Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Four of the five assignments of error which defendant has brought forward, in fact, present but a single issue, namely, whether the court erred in omitting the language “without legal justification” from its statement to the jury of the charge against defendant *368and its jury instructions. In the factual context of this case, the relevant legal justification is self-defense. We therefore consider these four assignments of error together.

Defendant was charged with violating G.S. § 14-34. That statute provides in pertinent part:

If any person shall point any gun or pistol at any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Lowe v. Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API