Legal Opinion

Lintz v. Howard

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1879Published

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment, entered against tbem and in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingalls, J. :

Although the facts were not very fully developed upon the trial, yet sufficient appears to enable us to gather the following as the history of the case. William Lintz, the plaintiff, to enable Joseph Eneas to borrow of George Ketehum $2,180, executed his promissory note payable to the order of Eneas for the above amount, who indorsed the same and delivered it to Ketehum, who advanced the money to Eneas. ' The plaintiff at the time received from Eneas a note for the same amount in exchange for the one which he had executed for the benefit of Eneas. The note which the plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coddington v. BayCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822
  2. Buckley v. BentleyNew York Supreme Court · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API