Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis Co., Inc. v. Guaranty Bank

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1932No. 28794Published

1Dissent

Smith, C. J.,

delivered a dissenting opinion.

Judge Anderson, who joins me herein, and I are of the opinion that sections 2275 and 2276, Code of 1930, have no application here, and that the rights of the several parties hereto are governed by section 5971, Code of 1930. Sections 2274 to 2280, inclusive, constitute the statutory scheme for securing the payment to subcontractors, laborers, and materialmen of the money due them in the construction of privately owned buildings or works, and article 6 of the chapter on Public Works, Code of 1930, in which section 5971 appears, is the statutory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alabama Marble Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Board of Supervisors v. GillenMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Oliver Const. Co. v. DancyMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  4. McGraw v. Board of Sup'rs of Winston CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McKinnon v. Gowan Bros.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API