Legal Opinion
State v. Muscat
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 27, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Certain portion of the charge of the trial judge to the jury in respect to defendant’s plea of self-defense, to which defendant excepts, while proper in trial of a homicide case, the Attorney General confesses is improper in instant case, and is prejudicial to defendant, under authority of S. v. Warren, 242 N.C. 581, 89 S.E. 2d, 109; S. v. Cephus, 239 N.C. 521, 80 S.E 2d, 147; S. v. Carver, 213 N.C. 150, 195 S.E. 349.
Hence let there be a
New trial.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. CephusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. . CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SandlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959