Legal Opinion

Hensley v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1929No. 26379PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This action was brought under the federal employers’ liability act, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff while working for defendant as a section laborer. Plaintiff recovered a judgment for $14,000. Defendant appeals. .

Of the many assignments of error,- we shall consider only such as seem necessary to a proper determination of the cause.

From the record it appears that the defendant operates á system of railways, extending into and through a num*692ber of states. Plaintiff had been employed for a number of years by the defendant as a section laborer.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Erie Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rickertsen v. CarskadonNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Begley v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Anderson v. LotmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Lindley v. Wabash Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hensley v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API