Legal Opinion

Muncey v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 4, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Dietzman

—Reversing.

Indicted for rape, the appellant, Clyde Muncey, was convicted of the offense of detaining a woman against her will with intent to have carnal knowledge of her, an offense included within the indictment, and sentenced to- serve three years and a day in the penitentiary. He appeals.

The main ground for reversal is that the verdict is flagrantly against the evidence, a contention which the facts in this case certainly justify.

The prosecuting witness, Dora Stidham, testified that she was 19 years old, a student in the high school at Hyden,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gravitt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Stewart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. Holland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  3. Carrier v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  4. Hightower v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  5. Weinel v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API