Roland Wayne Wright v. Walter E. Craven, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The District Court, in this habeas corpus action, ruled that under California law an admission by a defendant of prior felony convictions, where those convictions are to be used to enhance his sentence on the present offense, is the “functional equivalent” of a plea of guilty to a separate charge [see, Womack v. Craven, 431 F.2d 1191, 1192 (9th Cir. 1970)], and, therefore, it may not be accepted unless the defendant understands the consequences of the admission. We are in accord with the analysis of the court in its well-reasoned opinion, reported at 325 F.Supp. 1253.
After conducting an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wright v. CravenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
- Edison R. Womack v. Walter E. Craven, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Rea Lyn SegalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Billy Ray Cox v. Terrell Don Hutto, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.