Legal Opinion

Roland Wayne Wright v. Walter E. Craven, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1972No. 71-1949PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

The District Court, in this habeas corpus action, ruled that under California law an admission by a defendant of prior felony convictions, where those convictions are to be used to enhance his sentence on the present offense, is the “functional equivalent” of a plea of guilty to a separate charge [see, Womack v. Craven, 431 F.2d 1191, 1192 (9th Cir. 1970)], and, therefore, it may not be accepted unless the defendant understands the consequences of the admission. We are in accord with the analysis of the court in its well-reasoned opinion, reported at 325 F.Supp. 1253.

After conducting an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. CravenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
  2. Edison R. Womack v. Walter E. Craven, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Rea Lyn SegalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Billy Ray Cox v. Terrell Don Hutto, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API