Legal Opinion

Stillwell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1926No. 9795Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Upon more mature consideration we have concluded that we were wrong in holding that the trial court correctly refused to allow appellant to prove his general good reputation for truth and veracity by three witnesses named in bill of exceptions No. 4. The record shows that the state, in making out its case in chief, introduced three eyewitnesses to the homicide and rested. Among other witnesses appellant testified in his own behalf and swore that he killed deceased in self-defense. He said deceased had threatened him, and that when he went to the house…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Tellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  3. Ellington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API