Legal Opinion

Springfield Steam Laundry Co. v. Traders Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

. Appeal from the Greene Circuit Court. — Hon. J. T. Neville, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

This is an action on a policy of fire insurance. There is no question about the issuance of the policy, or the destruction of the property by fire during its life. It is also conceded that due notice of the fire was given, and that proper proofs of loss were furnished. At the time the policy was issued the property was mortgaged, and the policy provided that any loss should be paid to the mortgagee. The defense was that, prior to the destruction of the property, the conditions of the mortgage were violated, and that, by reason of-this, foreclosure proceedings were commenced which invalidated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Loehner v. Home Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  3. Franklin v. Atlantic Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  4. Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  5. Michigan State Insurance v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nixon v. German InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Springfield Steam Laundry Co. v. Traders InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Springfield Steam Laundry Co. v. Traders InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API