Legal Opinion

Goldblatt Bros. v. Sixty-Third & Halsted Realty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 1949No. Gen. No. 44,846PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Niemeyer

Sixty-Third and Halsted Realty Company, sublessor, hereafter called defendant, appeals from an interlocutory injunction restraining it from asserting any default against plaintiff, sublessee, and directing plaintiff to pay to the clerk of the court a part of the rent stipulated in the sublease under which plaintiff is in possession of the premises involved herein. The injunctional order was entered on plaintiff’s motion before answer filed by the defendant, and the correctness of the order must therefore be determined by the allegations of the complaint. Dunne v. County of Rock Island, 273…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Keating v. SpringerIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Coryell v. KlehmIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Giddings v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Dunne v. County of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. H. K. H. Development Corp. v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  2. Mid-City National Bank v. Mar Building Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Lipkin v. BurnstineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  4. Zion Industries, Inc. v. LoyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Chicago Motor Coach Co. v. BuddAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API