Legal Opinion
Hearst v. New Yorker Staats Zeitung
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Demurrer to fifteen separate defenses in an action for libel.
1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.
Plaintiff demurs to fifteen separáte defenses interposed in an action for libel upon the ground that each of them is insufficient in law on the face thereof. The complaint alleges three causes of action, to each of which the defendant sets up five separate defenses. The first cause of action is based upon an alleged publication on April 29, 1910, in defendant’s newspapers of a report of a speech delivered by Mayor Gaynor, the mayor of the city of Mew York, at a joint banquet of the “Associated Press ” and the *9“American Publishers’ Association ” on “ The Press and Its Relation to Public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Hoey v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Hollingsworth v. Spectator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Van Ingen v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Sbarboro v. Health DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dolcin Corp. v. Reader's Digest Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Ingalls v. MorrisseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Association for the Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc. v. PickeringNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Tower v. CrosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925