Legal Opinion
Roscoe C. Barnes v. Vadico Terminals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1969No. 12903PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Roscoe C. Barnes et al. would enforce against certain land in Rosslyn, Virginia or, alternatively, against a promissory note in the hands of appellee Arthur R. Morrison, a judgment the Barnes hold against appellee Vadico Terminals, Inc. In each instance the land or the note is alleged to be, in truth, an asset of Vadico although Vadi-co does not have the record title or possession.
The Barnes’ judgment, procured on May 27, 1966, evolved from the default of Vadico on the purchase money notes it gave in buying from the Barnes, during the fall of 1962, an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Layton v. Selb Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Capital Investors Co. v. DeversCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hyman v. Porter (In Re Porter)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984
- Smith v. Porter (In Re Carr & Porter, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- In Re C-T of Virginia, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Craddock-Terry Shoe Corporation, Debtor. C-T of Virginia, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Craddock-Terry Shoe Corporation v. Painewebber, Inc., in Re C-T of Virginia, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Craddock-Terry Shoe Corporation, Debtor. C-T of Virginia, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Craddock-Terry Shoe Corporation v. Painewebber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991