Legal Opinion

Catherine Dixon v. B. & B. R. R.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1881No. Nos. 20,577, 20,579, 20,580, and 20,581, ConsolidatedPublished

The Case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hasner

On the 27th of February, 1879, on application of the several plaintiffs, a justice of the peace issued warrants, directed .to the marshal of the District of Columbia, requiring him to summon in each case a jury of twenty citizens to assemble on the premises and assess the damages sustained by the plaintiffs, respectively, in consequence of the laying of the defendant’s railroad track along Sixth street. The marshal summoned the same twenty persons to appear in each case. The jury appeared at the time named, and the list of names was submitted by the marshal to the respective attorneys that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newcomer v. KeedyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  2. Longwell v. RidingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1843

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API