Legal Opinion

Becker v. Fudge

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 21, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2022-3670Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KIRK BECKER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-3670 (RDM) MARCIA FUDGE, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this case, Plaintiff Kirk Becker, proceeding pro se, challenges the lawfulness of a rule promulgated nearly eight years ago by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HUD”) prohibiting smoking in public housing units (“the Smoke-Free Rule” or “the Rule”). See Dkt. 1 at 2 (Compl. ¶ 1);

81 Fed. Reg. 87,430

(Dec. 5, 2016). In particular, Becker alleges that the Smoke-Free Rule…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Yamaha Corporation of America v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API