Legal Opinion

United States v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 31, 1975No. Nos. 73-2116 and 74-1794PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Judge:

Petitioner, United States, on behalf of the Defense Department (DOD), seeks review of Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) Economic Regulations (ER) 819 and 861 (of August 28, 1973, and June 11, 1974, respectively). The effect of these ER’s is that DOD owes, as stated by counsel roughly, an additional $5,000,000 to the intervenors, United States commercial airlines, for charter air services rendered to the Military Airlift Command (MAC) during the period July 1, 1972, to August 28, 1973.

The sole issue is the power of the CAB to correct an order founded on an error of fact and to make…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Frisco Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Erick Rios Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., and Northwest Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. United States of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Braniff Airways, Inc., and Northwest Airlines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API