Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Cox

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1889No. 13,466PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

It is alleged in the first paragraph of the complaint of the appellees that Eli Murdock died, intestate, in 1869; that he was, at the time of his death, the owner of a large quantity of land, and a large amount of personal property, and that all of his indebtedness has been paid; that in February, 1869, the heirs of the intestate partitioned the land of which he died seized, and that his widow, Jane Murdock, conveyed to the heirs all her interest in the land; that the better to secure herself means of support during her life, she required each of the heirs to execute to her a mortgage, upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bever v. NorthIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Buchanan v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Bartholomew v. PiersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Colt v. McConnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Sinker, Davis & Co. v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McAfee v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State ex rel. McPherson v. BecknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Sheets v. StiefelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Butler v. ThornburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Schofield v. GreenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API