Legal Opinion

Tollefson Development, Inc. v. McCarthy

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 16, 2003No. A03-185Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

On appeal from the dismissal of its action for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted, appellant argues that the settlement of a separate action to enforce a purchase agreement to transfer real property creates an equitable interest in the land sufficient to sustain this action for partition. We affirm.

FACTS

James McCarthy and respondent Patrick McCarthy were brothers and owners as tenants in common of a parcel of real property located in Eagan. On August 17, 2000, James McCarthy signed a purchase agreement to sell his interest (approximately 60 acres)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. S. R. A., Inc. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Helvey v. O'NEILLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. In Re Petition of S. R. A. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API