Glidewell v. M'Gaughey
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Putnam Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
This was an action of debt by M’Gaughey, clerk of the Putnam Circuit Court, against Saunders and Glide-well. The declaration commences as follows:—Arthur M’Gaughey, clerk of-the Putnam Circuit Court, complains for himself and others, officers of said Court, who may be interested herein, of Henry Saunders and Robert Glidewell in custody, &c. of aplea that they render unto the said M’Gaughey, clerk as aforesaid, and others, officers of said Court, who may be interested *360kere^n’ ^ie sum of 300 .dollars, &c. The ■ cause of action, as shown in the declaration, is a bond in the penalty of 300…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Sterling City Gold & Silver Mining & Tunneling Co. v. CockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
- Cahill v. VanlaninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Conwell v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
- State ex rel. Abrahams v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Trimble v. State ex rel. HobaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1835