Legal Opinion

Glidewell v. M'Gaughey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1830PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of debt by M’Gaughey, clerk of the Putnam Circuit Court, against Saunders and Glide-well. The declaration commences as follows:—Arthur M’Gaughey, clerk of-the Putnam Circuit Court, complains for himself and others, officers of said Court, who may be interested herein, of Henry Saunders and Robert Glidewell in custody, &c. of aplea that they render unto the said M’Gaughey, clerk as aforesaid, and others, officers of said Court, who may be interested *360kere^n’ ^ie sum of 300 .dollars, &c. The ■ cause of action, as shown in the declaration, is a bond in the penalty of 300…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sterling City Gold & Silver Mining & Tunneling Co. v. CockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
  2. Cahill v. VanlaninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Conwell v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  4. State ex rel. Abrahams v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Trimble v. State ex rel. HobaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1835

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API